
"Shipbreaking No. 23, Chittagong, Bangladesh" . 2000 . From the series Ships > Ship Breaking
© Edward Burtynsky
I had never really seen much of Burtynsky's portrait work, and was surprised by how many images were featured in the film that incorporated a person. I usually associate his photographs that include a figure, with the figure as part of the landscape, not the subject. When browsing around his website I could only come up with this one specific example (above), which is on the boarder in terms of being considered a 'portrait.'
One other element that always lingers in the background for a photographer that works in a method like Burtynsky is the issue of access. It was interesting to see him negotiating with people in order to take an image of what would otherwise be a closed world. Which brings me to Polidori and Gursky. It seems to me that a lot of the imagery that I associate with these photographers is deeply rooted in the idea of access. Images of factories by Gursky and Burtynsky seem to separate themselves very thinly in terms of individuality and complexity.

"Siemens, Karlsruhe" . 1991
© Andreas Gursky

"Manufacturing #6A, Hongqingting Shoe Factory, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province" . 2004
From the series China > Manufacturing
© Edward Burtynsky
To me ideas of photographic artistry are stripped away to reveal a more documentary aspect to this work. This is not to say that they are both mediocre photographers, because to the contrary I think they are two of my favorites, and are fantastic image makers. I raise this issue because I wonder if my fascination with their work lies more on the idea(s) of spectacle and revelation then on pure artistic voice.
Another example would be Polidori and Burtynsky's photographs of energy infrastructure.

"High Voltage Power Lines and Transformers" . 2001 . From the series Chernobyl
© Robert Polidori

"Oil Refineries No. 10, Oakville, Ontario" . 1999 . From the series Oil > Oil Refineries
© Edward Burtysky
Although the context of each photograph is completely different (oil refinery in Canada vs. electrical grid in Chernobyl after a nuclear meltdown) I find my interest in each subject coming from the same place, access. They are both well composed expertly shot images, but do they speak for, and of, the photographer? Or do they speak more towards their interest in a specific part of the contemporary landscape? Again, not to say that one is necessarily more valid then the other, but I do think that there are some inherent differences in working method that separate this group of photographers from many other contemporary image makers.
Finally, the images by Burtysky of China, which are the main focus of the movie, also draw some parallels to Polidori, and even Sze Tsung Leong (although I think Leong's work comes from a unique perspective, not only because he is a part of the nation and landscape that he is photographing, but also to me his work is less about access and more about a cultural attitude).

"Shibati, Yuzhong District, Chongqing" . 2003
© Sze Tsung Leong

"Urban Renewal #4, Old City Overview, Shanghai" . 2004 .
From the series China > Urban Renewal
© Edward Burtynsky

"Oriental Pearl T.V. Tower and Jin Mao Tower, Pudong, Shanghai, China" . 2004
© Robert Polidori

"Urban Renewal #8, Hold Out, Shanghai" . 2004
From the series China > Urban Renewal
© Edward Burtynsky

3 comments:
Justin, I was thinking of similar things this week when I was looking at Taryn Simon's An American Index of the Hidden and Unfamiliar. The photographs are beautifully done, but they're so . . . done. I respect her book, but I'm not sure I like it, if that makes sense. I respect the work, the effort, the fact that she got a camera inside the den of a hibernating bear, but the images themselves aren't anything I need to return to over and over again the way I do with photographs I love.
good observations, I believe what your are seeing in Burtynsky's photographs is an artist far removed from the social dynamic of the place he is photographing. I heard Burtynsky speak once and he had a very professional demeanor, kind of sterile in a way. The same can be said for his work, the facsination is yes; access. Next scale, enormous prints extremely detailed, he owns a printing business for heaven sakes, he has the means and "access" to show us a world that looks like the future, although it happens to be Asia, where scale and production facilitate Burtynsky's ability to create beautiful photographs on an imaginable scale with little regard for subjection. His work can be directly related to "The New Topographics" a photo movement back in the 70's.
Liz,
I was thinking the exact same thing. To a T.
Post a Comment